Tuya Smart Sockets: A Comprehensive Review of Aubess, TNCE, and Elivco

This review dives deep into the world of budget-friendly Tuya-compatible smart sockets, specifically examining three popular brands: Aubess, TNCE, and Elivco. We explore the performance, reliability, and overall user experience of these devices, focusing on their key features such as remote control, scheduling, and power monitoring. Our assessment is based on extensive testing and highlights both the advantages and significant drawbacks encountered during use. The goal is to provide a comprehensive and unbiased perspective to help consumers make informed decisions when choosing a smart socket for their needs.While these cheap smart sockets promise convenient features like remote on/off control and power monitoring, our experience revealed significant limitations. We discuss the challenges encountered with app connectivity, scheduling reliability, and the accuracy of power monitoring data. Particular attention is paid to the Aubess brand, which consistently underperformed compared to other options. This review will help you determine if these budget-friendly options are suitable for your home automation needs, or if investing in a more reputable brand is a worthwhile consideration.

Pros And Cons

ITCO Smart Socket
  • Slightly better than OBUS
  • Works for most things
  • Not very reliable
  • Sometimes misses scheduled times
  • Can have trouble connecting

Read more: AMI Meter Reading Guide: Understanding Your Smart Electricity Meter

Reliability and Performance: A Disappointing Experience

My experience with several cheap Chinese smart sockets, including the popular Aubess brand, has been overwhelmingly negative. These sockets consistently proved unreliable, frequently failing to connect to the smartphone app or correctly execute scheduled on/off commands. The power monitoring feature, while present, was also inaccurate and often lagged.

Screenshot showing a close-up of a smart socket labeled 'Aubess'.
Screenshot showing a close-up of a smart socket labeled 'Aubess'.

The Aubess brand, in particular, was exceptionally poor. It regularly missed scheduled times and demonstrated significant unreliability. This is a widespread issue, not isolated to my experience. I've used other brands, such as Itco, with somewhat better performance, but these too had considerable limitations.

Screenshot of the app interface showing a failed scheduling attempt.
Screenshot of the app interface showing a failed scheduling attempt.

App Functionality and Connectivity Issues

The accompanying smartphone app, often called 'Toya Smart,' presents its own set of challenges. Pairing the sockets to the app was a tedious and frustrating process. It frequently required enabling mobile data or Wi-Fi, and sometimes even turning on a mobile hotspot. The app itself has a tendency to 'forget' the connected sockets, requiring repeated pairing attempts.

Screenshot showing the 'Toya Smart' app interface.
Screenshot showing the 'Toya Smart' app interface.

Despite these hurdles, the app offers some useful features. Remote on/off control, scheduling, and even basic power monitoring are available. However, the unreliability of the connection significantly diminishes the usefulness of these features.

Screenshot illustrating the app's connection difficulties.
Screenshot illustrating the app's connection difficulties.

Power Monitoring Capabilities and Limitations

The power monitoring functionality is a key selling point of these smart sockets, but the accuracy is questionable. While it generally displays the current power consumption, it is often slow to update and occasionally fails entirely. I experienced this when trying to monitor a refrigerator's power usage; the socket did not register any consumption.

Screenshot of the app displaying power consumption of a phone charger.
Screenshot of the app displaying power consumption of a phone charger.

For less demanding applications, such as monitoring a phone charger, the monitoring worked reasonably well. However, for precise or critical power monitoring, these sockets fall significantly short. The data logging also occasionally showed inconsistencies.

Screenshot of the app failing to register power usage of a refrigerator.
Screenshot of the app failing to register power usage of a refrigerator.

Scheduling and Other Features

The app allows for the creation of detailed schedules, specifying the days and times for turning the socket on or off. While this feature generally functions, it's prone to failure, particularly with the Aubess brand, sometimes failing to execute scheduled actions.

Screenshot of the app's scheduling interface.
Screenshot of the app's scheduling interface.

Other settings include options for what happens when power is restored after an outage. These extra features add functionality but are ultimately overshadowed by the core performance issues.

Screenshot showing the advanced settings within the app.
Screenshot showing the advanced settings within the app.

Overall Assessment and Recommendations

In summary, my experience with these budget smart sockets has been disappointing. While they offer appealing features like remote control, scheduling, and power monitoring, their unreliability renders them largely unusable for anything beyond simple on/off tasks. The Aubess brand is particularly problematic; I strongly advise against purchasing it.

Screenshot showing the Aubess brand socket, highlighting its poor quality.
Screenshot showing the Aubess brand socket, highlighting its poor quality.

For a few dollars more, better quality and more reliable alternatives exist, making these budget options a poor investment. If you're determined to try a cheap option, I might suggest the Itco brand only if you can find it for $2-3 and understand the likely limitations. For reliable performance, consider spending a bit more on a more established brand with a proven track record.

Screenshot showing a comparison between different brands.
Screenshot showing a comparison between different brands.